.svg)
10 Best Xactly Competitors & Alternatives in 2025
There was a time when choosing Xactly meant checking the box. You needed an enterprise-grade ICM solution? You picked the incumbent. Job done.
But that was before incentive compensation became a strategic lever. Before sales teams demanded real-time earnings visibility instead of vague end-of-month PDFs. And before companies grew tired of stitching together separate modules just to handle planning, payouts, and performance in one place.
Now, the stakes are higher, and so are the expectations.
You want a system that gives you control over plan design, data, and performance. A platform that automates more than just calculations and goes a step further to deliver insights, agility, and trust.
In this guide, we’ll walk through ten of the best Xactly alternatives in the market. We’ll cover where each shines, where they struggle, and what kind of teams they’re suited for. Whether you're actively replacing Xactly or just questioning if it's still right for where you’re headed, this list is built to help you make a confident, future-ready decision.
What Should You Look for in an Xactly Competitor?
To be perfectly honest, it’s not hard to find another incentive compensation platform. It’s hard, however, to find one that solves the problems that pushed you to start looking in the first place.
Xactly set the standard in an era where “enterprise” meant large, slow, and IT-dependent. But the needs of RevOps, Finance, and Comp teams have evolved. They are now on the hunt for speed, clarity, and the ability to drive performance across every part of the business.
So, what does that mean in practice?
Agility Without Engineering Overhead
The biggest frustration with legacy tools is needing a dev team to update a compensation plan. If your business shifts (new product lines, territories, or KPIs), your system should flex with you, not send you back to professional services for help. Look for no-code or logic-based plan builders that empower RevOps and Finance to own the process.
Real-Time Visibility That Actually Works
According to our 2025 Incentive Compensation Report, only 52% of companies provide reps with real-time performance tracking, and just 50% offer visibility into current and potential earnings. That’s a trust problem and a performance problem. An ICM and SPM tool should give sellers and managers alike real-time views into earnings, performance, and milestones, without back-and-forths or manual intervention.
Automation That Stretches Beyond Calculations
Most platforms can calculate payouts. But great ones also automate crediting, approvals, error handling, plan versioning, and reporting—thus reducing admin time, speeding up payroll, and eliminating shadow accounting. Bonus points if the software surfaces insights or flags anomalies before you even ask.
Unified Planning and Performance
Compensation doesn’t exist in a vacuum. Territory design, quota setting, and performance tracking are all part of the same engine (or at least, they should be). Top contenders now include planning and modeling tools alongside compensation workflows so that GTM teams can align strategy with execution in one place (without having to buy extra modules).
Audit-Ready Infrastructure
As regulations tighten (hello, ASC 606 and FASB updates!), auditability is no longer optional. Seek out tools with version control, approval trails, plan documentation, and compliance baked in, not bolted on.
Scalability Without System Bloat
The system you choose should grow with you without doubling your admin headcount. That means handling more reps, plans, geos, and exceptions without becoming brittle. If your team is spending 89 hours a month wrangling comp (like 70% of orgs still are), it’s simply not the right software.
Look for a platform that’s built for where you’re going, not where you’ve been. Because incentive compensation, shouldn’t just support your growth. It should drive it.
10 Xactly Competitors, Ranked & Reviewed
Plenty of platforms claim to “do commissions.” Still, not all of them are designed to handle the real-world complexity of modern compensation, or the speed at which most go-to-market teams now operate.
The following Xactly alternatives are the ones we’ve seen evaluated by Comp, Revenue, and Finance teams who’ve outgrown legacy systems and need something more.
Each has its strengths: some favor simplicity, others lean into configurability. But only a few are actually ready to replace Xactly at scale.
Let’s break them down.
1. CaptivateIQ
Built for modern revenue organizations, CaptivateIQ offers far more than commission automation. It’s a full Sales Performance Management (SPM) platform that spans everything from compensation calculation to territory design, quota modeling, and incentive forecasting, with real-time visibility and planning baked in at every level.
SmartGrid™ is CaptivateIQ’s no-code modeling engine that gives RevOps and Finance teams the power to build and adjust comp plans on their terms (no engineering required). Need to roll out a new SPIFF mid-quarter? Reallocate territories based on capacity? Model the downstream impact of a quota change? With CaptivateIQ, you can do it in minutes.
Where many tools focus narrowly on payout logistics, CaptivateIQ expands the lens: it connects incentive design with go-to-market execution, giving leaders the insights they need to optimize performance, align teams, and adapt strategy on the fly.
Key features:
- End-to-end flexibility: Design and manage even the most complex plans (SPIFFs, MBOs, team-based bonuses, global overlays) without writing a line of code.
- Connected planning: Centralize sales planning with tools for territory carving, quota assignments, and scenario modeling, all linked to live performance data.
- Real-time visibility: Give reps instant access to earnings, progress-to-quota, and what-if modeling. Managers get performance dashboards, while Finance gets clean, auditable logs.
- Automation with oversight: Automate calculations, approvals, and reporting while maintaining version control, compliance, and full audit readiness.
- Insights that drive action: Track ROI, efficiency, and plan performance through custom dashboards or prebuilt reports. Use AI-powered Assist for fast answers and smarter decisions.
Our 2025 ICM Report found that only 30% of companies feel “very prepared” for market shifts. CaptivateIQ was built to address that gap. The platform allows companies to act fast by bringing together all the levers that drive performance under one roof: comp, planning, analytics, and strategy.
Best for: High-growth teams that want full control, not just over comp, but over planning, performance, and scale.
Ratings:
2. Everstage
Everstage is part of a newer class of ICM platforms built around clarity and control. For small to mid-sized teams moving off spreadsheets (or off systems that leave sellers in the dark), it offers a more modern, visual, and transparent way to manage commissions.
With Everstage, reps get live dashboards and payout forecasts through a clean UI, and admins can model plans using a spreadsheet-style builder that doesn’t require code or IT. Implementation is typically fast, and the platform includes tools for dispute management, milestone tracking, and personalized statements, all designed to make the monthly comp cycle feel less like triage.
However, when you dig beneath the interface, the limits start to show. Some user reviews point to slow system performance and laggy updates, and the UI, while clean, can be inconsistent. For teams scaling quickly or pushing into more complex logic, these delays can add up.
Still, for orgs with relatively straightforward comp needs and an appetite for faster time to value, Everstage is a great step up from manual workflows. It’s especially appealing for SaaS companies in growth mode that want to boost trust, reduce disputes, and give reps more visibility.
Key features:
- Spreadsheet-style plan builder: No-code interface for modeling SPIFFs, accelerators, and tiered logic.
- Live dashboards for reps: Personalized views of attainment, earnings, and performance trends.
- Dispute management: Built-in ticketing to track and resolve payout questions.
- Crystal forecasting engine: Predictive insights into rep earnings and performance trajectory.
- Approval workflows: Manage exceptions and plan changes with simple routing logic.
- Audit logs and plan versioning: Basic compliance and tracking tools for payout accuracy.
Best for: Lean RevOps teams looking for a modern UI, fast implementation, and seller-friendly visibility, without heavy admin overhead.
Ratings:
3. Visdum
Visdum is a no-code ICM platform designed for teams that need structure and automation, but not necessarily all the bells (or cost) of heavyweight tools. It strikes a middle ground: more powerful than a spreadsheet, more affordable than an enterprise suite, and generally easier to adopt than legacy systems trying to be all things to all departments.
The UI leans familiar, especially for RevOps teams used to working in sheets. Pre-built plan templates cover common comp structures (e.g., SPIFFs, splits, draws, and tiered accelerators), and users can model, adjust, and deploy new logic without technical support. It also includes dispute resolution workflows, rep-facing dashboards, and compensation statements that help eliminate confusion and reduce shadow accounting.
That said, Visdum isn’t without tradeoffs. Some users cite a lack of support resources, while others mention mobile bugs and slower load times when accessing performance data on the go. Even so, for growing companies that need a clear path off spreadsheets, Visdum is a worthy contender. It’s especially well-suited to sales orgs that need clarity and control without taking on unnecessary operational overhead.
Key features:
- No-code plan modeling: Build tiered, split, or draw-based plans without engineering support.
- Rep dashboards and statements: Clear earnings visibility to reduce payout confusion.
- Plan templates for SaaS roles: Pre-configured logic tailored to common SaaS comp structures.
- Dispute resolution workflow: Log, track, and resolve payout issues internally.
- Native integrations: Connect to Salesforce, HubSpot, NetSuite, and other core systems.
Best for: Mid-sized SaaS and tech companies that want to graduate from spreadsheets without diving into full enterprise complexity.
Ratings:
4. Spiff by Salesforce
Spiff made its name as the commission tool that reps actually want to use. Its UI is polished, intuitive, and refreshingly non-enterprise in feel. For sales teams that live inside Salesforce and want real-time clarity on what they’ve earned, Spiff checks a lot of the right boxes.
It’s especially well-suited to orgs with lean RevOps teams and relatively clean comp logic. Think quota-based plans with a couple of accelerators, maybe a SPIFF or two. In that environment, Spiff hums. Dashboards are responsive, payouts are visually modeled, and sellers don’t need to shadow-account, as they can see exactly how they’re tracking, straight from the CRM.
The friction starts when complexity creeps in. User reviews cite challenges around data sync delays, especially for teams managing larger pipelines or higher volumes of rep activity. Missing features are also a downside some users point to (e.g., an underdeveloped ticketing system and a lack of detail on how comp plans are calculated).
Still, for smaller teams prioritizing usability over configurability (or for those early in their ICM journey), Spiff offers a fast, friendly alternative to heavier legacy systems.
Key features:
- Visual plan builder: Drag-and-drop interface to configure SPIFFs, accelerators, and quotas.
- Native Salesforce integration: Real-time sync for deal data and commission triggers.
- Rep dashboards: Personalized views of earnings, attainment, and payout history.
- Dispute management: Built-in workflows to review and resolve commission issues
- SOC 2 and ASC 606 support: Basic audit readiness for compliance-conscious teams.
- Approval workflows: Route exceptions or changes through predefined logic chains.
Best for: Salesforce-first teams with straightforward plans and a need for sleek, seller-friendly visibility.
Ratings:
5. QuotaPath
QuotaPath is all about simplicity, not just in product design, but in its entire approach to incentive compensation. It’s meant for sales teams that need to ditch spreadsheets, give reps a live view into earnings, and keep comp logic manageable without bringing in a systems architect. And on those fronts, it delivers.
The UI is approachable, the setup is quick, and features like self-serve plan building, deal modeling, and gamified leaderboards make it especially appealing for lean RevOps teams. It syncs with Salesforce and HubSpot and is designed to give individual contributors more visibility into how deals tie to earnings without making them wait for month-end reports.
As for drawbacks, users cite delays in CRM data syncing, slow load times, and occasional integration issues, none of which are deal-breakers for a small team, but all of which become frustrating at scale. If your priority is fast time-to-value and basic visibility for reps, QuotaPath is a solid fit.
Key features:
- Self-serve plan builder: Create simple comp plans with minimal ramp-up.
- Deal modeling: Reps can forecast earnings at the opportunity level.
- Leaderboards and goal tracking: Gamify attainment and drive friendly competition.
- CRM integrations: Connects to Salesforce and HubSpot for real-time sync.
- Rep dashboards: Live visibility into commissions and progress-to-quota.
- Embedded payout calculations: View earnings per deal with clear attribution logic.
Best for: Small sales teams or early-stage startups that want fast, visual commission tracking without the complexity of full-scale comp infrastructure.
Ratings:
6. Varicent
Varicent isn’t trying to be light or fast. It’s trying to be exhaustive, and in that, it succeeds.
Designed for enterprise orgs with sprawling sales teams, layered logic, and tight compliance standards, Varicent offers the kind of configurability that makes IT teams nod their heads in approval. You can model nearly any compensation rule and track it all down to the audit log. There’s no shortage of power here.
But with that power comes lift. Users report long onboarding cycles, steep learning curves, and the need for dedicated admins or external support, especially during implementation. The platform is robust, but not always nimble, meaning day-to-day agility often takes a backseat to long-term control.
That said, Varicent shines in industries where structure matters as much as flexibility. If you're in financial services, manufacturing, or global tech with rigid governance standards, and you’ve got the resources to support a dense platform, Varicent can more than meet the moment. Just know that agility comes at a cost, and simplicity isn’t always part of the pitch.
Key features:
- Low-code/no-code plan builder: Design and deploy highly complex comp logic with tiered conditions, splits, and region-based rules.
- AI-powered insights: Built-in intelligence for performance forecasting, risk flagging, and optimization recommendations.
- Real-time commission estimator: Reps can model payouts based on deal inputs before close.
- Strong audit and compliance tools: Robust support for SOX and global data governance.
- Scenario planning: Model changes to compensation plans and forecast the downstream impact.
- Slack integration: Automated commission notifications and updates pushed to reps in real-time.
Best for: Large enterprises with complex global comp structures, deep compliance needs, and the technical muscle to support a heavyweight platform.
Ratings:
7. Performio
Performio is a commission automation platform that sits comfortably in the middle: more scalable than homegrown tools, less demanding than heavyweight SPM suites. For teams looking to modernize payouts, reduce manual errors, and give reps a cleaner view into earnings, it’s a practical next step.
The platform offers a spreadsheet-style plan builder that makes adoption easier for compensation admins who are used to working in Excel. Dashboards are configurable, comp statements are auto-generated, and performance data is surfaced cleanly for both reps and managers. It also includes audit-friendly features like SOC 1 and SOC 2 compliance and credit allocation logic, making it a solid fit for companies with growing oversight requirements.
That said, some users flag sluggish performance, while others point to occasional missing functionality and layout issues. The basics are there, but for teams that need speed, deeper modeling, or advanced visualization, those gaps can add friction.
Key features:
- Plan builder: Spreadsheet-inspired interface for modeling and adjusting comp plans.
- Comp statements and dashboards: Rep-facing visuals for transparency and engagement.
- Credit allocation engine: Handle splits, overrides, and conditional logic.
- Automated payouts: End-to-end calculation and processing workflows.
- SOC 1 and SOC 2 compliance: Meets audit and regulatory requirements.
- CRM and ERP Integrations: Native support for Salesforce, NetSuite, and other core tools.
Best for: Mid-sized teams that want to move away from spreadsheets and into structured automation without taking on full enterprise-level complexity.
Ratings:
8. Anaplan
Anaplan didn’t start in comp, it started in planning. That legacy still shapes the product today.
For teams looking to centralize headcount modeling, territory assignments, quota distribution, or high-level GTM planning, Anaplan offers powerful multidimensional modeling capabilities. It’s a favorite among Finance and Operations teams that need to align forecasts across geos, products, and business units, not just for sales, but for everything from supply chain to workforce strategy.
But when it comes to day-to-day incentive compensation execution, Anaplan wasn’t built for speed or simplicity. Users note a steep learning curve, especially for teams moving over from Excel or more visual systems. The model-building framework is powerful, but often opaque, requiring users to think in multidimensional structures that aren’t always intuitive. Other commonly cited challenges include performance issues with large or complex datasets (unless you’re using Polaris), limited visualization tools, and a lack of streamlined lifecycle management in the UX.
For strategic planning, Anaplan delivers. But if your team is looking for a more agile, purpose-built solution to automate commissions and motivate sellers in real time, it may feel more like a foundation than a finished product.
Key features:
- Connected planning engine: Align GTM, finance, and operations in a unified modeling platform.
- Multi-dimensional modeling: Build complex models across multiple hierarchies, regions, and time periods.
- Scenario planning: Test assumptions and adjust targets based on live business inputs.
- Role-based access control: Granular visibility management across departments and regions.
- Data integrations: APIs and native connectors to link ERP, CRM, and HCM systems.
- Quotas and territory assignment: Advanced planning capabilities to define sales coverage and goals.
Best for: Enterprises prioritizing top-down planning, forecasting, and modeling across business units, with the resources to support a heavy, multi-team implementation.
Ratings:
9. Oracle Sales Performance Management
Oracle’s Sales Performance Management suite sits exactly where you’d expect: squarely in the enterprise tier, optimized for scale, and deeply integrated into Oracle’s broader cloud ecosystem. For teams already invested in Oracle Sales Cloud, HCM, or ERP, its SPM tool offers tight data alignment and enterprise-grade configurability.
Core strengths include territory and quota planning, credit assignment, and compensation calculation, all of which are designed to handle complex, rule-heavy environments. It also offers strong audit and compliance support, which is a draw for heavily regulated industries like insurance, banking, or telco.
But power comes with friction. Users cite the tool’s steep learning curve and non-intuitive UI, with some reviewers noting that even basic navigation can be confusing without extensive training. It’s not a plug-and-play platform, and without internal technical expertise or third-party consultants, initial setup and plan changes can stall. Smaller teams or those without a dedicated Oracle admin may find themselves overwhelmed.
Cost is another consideration. Between licensing, implementation, and required onboarding time, Oracle’s SPM solution can be difficult to justify for orgs that aren’t fully bought into the broader Oracle ecosystem, or that need to move quickly without relying on specialized support.
In short: if you’re an Oracle shop and have the muscle to manage it, the platform delivers enterprise reliability. But if you’re looking for agility, ease of use, or a system that empowers operators without steep overhead, you’ll likely hit friction.
Key features:
- Quota and territory management: Align sales targets and rep coverage with top-down GTM priorities.
- Compensation plan modeling: Handle complex logic with multi-step, rule-based plan configuration.
- Credit assignment and split logic: Support for layered, conditional crediting structures.
- Audit and compliance tools: Enterprise-ready tracking, documentation, and version control.
- Workflow approvals: Route plan changes and payout exceptions through predefined governance flows.
- Integration with Oracle cloud apps: Seamless sync with Oracle CRM, ERP, and HCM products
Best for: Enterprise organizations already embedded in the Oracle ecosystem, with access to technical support and a high threshold for complexity.
Ratings:
10. SAP SuccessFactors
SAP SuccessFactors includes a wide range of workforce tools, from performance management and succession planning to learning, onboarding, and compensation. Within that mix lives its Sales Performance Management module, which offers core functionality like territory planning, quota assignments, and incentive compensation. For HR-led orgs looking to house all talent-related workflows in one place, the appeal is obvious: fewer systems, centralized data, and enterprise governance.
But as with many all-in-one suites, what you gain in consolidation, you often lose in agility.
For companies that just want SPM (not an entire HCM infrastructure), SuccessFactors can feel overbuilt. Compensation is just one tile in a much larger mosaic, and unlocking its full potential often requires engaging with tools and processes well beyond what a Sales, RevOps, or Finance team needs. Reporting has also been flagged as a sticking point, with users citing unintuitive layouts, manual data retrieval, and limited customization when filtering or searching through forms.
If you’re already using SuccessFactors as your system of record for HR, its SPM tools offer enough to avoid another vendor. But for teams that need SPM to move quickly and live closer to Sales and Finance than HR, this can feel like a tool built for another buyer entirely.
Key features:
- Quota and territory management: Assign sales goals and coverage plans across global teams.
- Incentive compensation administration: Support for variable pay structures tied to performance targets.
- Goal and performance alignment: Connect incentives to broader workforce objectives.
- Employee records integration: Sync comp plans and performance data with HR profiles.
- Workflow tools: Route approvals, exception handling, and document generation through HR-defined logic.
- Reporting and analytics: Prebuilt reports for compensation cycles, attainment, and payouts.
Best for: Global HR-driven organizations that want SPM tools embedded in a broader HCM suite, and have the patience to navigate the layers.
Ratings:
How to Choose the Right Xactly Alternative for Your Team
Every platform in this list solves something, but not all of them solve your something. So, before you shortlist vendors, pressure-test what you actually need from your next system. Not just features, but fit.
Start With What’s Broken
It’s tempting to look for more features. More dashboards, more modeling options, more AI. But more isn’t helpful if you haven’t defined what’s slowing your team down.
Is comp admin spending hours tracking down data every month? Are reps confused about how they’re paid? Are you stuck in a cycle where plan changes take weeks and require a support ticket just to adjust a quota?
If the pain is process friction, prioritize automation. If the problem is trust, start with visibility. If it’s about strategic planning, choose a platform that lets you model and course-correct, not just process payouts.
Don’t Just Solve for Today
A lot of teams choose their next comp platform based on what they need to fix right now: a confusing SPIFF, a missed payout, an executive who wants prettier reports. That’s understandable (and why we talked about looking at what’s broken first), but short-sighted.
Comp complexity doesn’t stay static. You’ll launch new products or start experimenting with MBOs or team-based bonuses. When that happens, the system you picked for “today’s problems” has to either change with you or get replaced all over again.
So instead of just asking: Can this platform solve our current comp plan?, ask: Can this platform handle what our comp plans will look like 18 months from now, when headcount doubles and the CFO wants quarterly modeling?
Know Your Team’s Appetite for Ownership
Some platforms require engineering support for every plan update. Others expect you to log a ticket just to change a rate. There are even tools that market themselves as “no-code,” but quietly rely on vendor services the moment things get complex.
The question is: how much control do you want in-house?
If your RevOps and Finance teams want to own the system (to build, test, and launch plans without outside help), you need clarity on how logic is structured, visibility into data sources, guardrails that prevent mistakes, and flexibility that lets your operators move fast when the occasion calls for it.
On the flip side, if your team doesn’t have the capacity to manage plan design or payout rules day to day, you’ll want to evaluate a vendor’s onboarding process, responsiveness, and support SLAs with just as much scrutiny as the product itself.
Push the Demo Past the Script
Every platform looks great in a canned demo. That’s the whole point: you’re seeing the cleanest version of the product, with a perfectly staged comp plan and just the right filters pre-applied.
But the real test is what happens when you bring your mess into the room.
If you want to know whether a platform can actually handle your business, don’t sit through a product tour. Run a scenario. Bring one of your real plans (the one with tiered accelerators, team quotas, and overrides), and ask the vendor to build it live. Mid-call, change a rate. Modify the ramp schedule. See how long it takes to model something that mirrors your world.
A great platform adjusts without breaking everything else. If a demo can’t show that, you’re watching a performance more than you’re evaluating a potential solution.
Xactly vs. CaptivateIQ: A Side-by-Side Comparison
Why Top Organizations Choose CaptivateIQ
Leading revenue teams don’t evaluate comp tools in isolation. They’re looking for infrastructure: a platform that supports strategic planning, real-time visibility, and incentive programs that actually influence behavior. That’s the bar CaptivateIQ meets.
CaptivateIQ gives you real control. Not just over commissions, but over how you design comp plan, how you track, and how quickly your business adapts when priorities change.
From startups heading toward IPO to global revenue teams balancing multiple plans, products, and geos, CaptivateIQ helps organizations:
- Design and deploy complex comp plans without engineering.
- Model quota and territory changes in real time.
- Give reps instant visibility into what they’ve earned.
- Automate the entire payout process, end-to-end.
- Track ROI, improve plan performance, and adapt faster.
If you’re ready to replace the legacy platform that’s slowing you down (or avoid adopting one that won’t scale), CaptivateIQ gives you more than automation. It gives you leverage.
Book a demo with our team to learn more!
.png)
